In my article published in the third edition of the "enlightened world" under the title "The Fate of the consciousness of the people in this age of rationalism," I made a point of rationalism, the human race that there would be a better world, in their Progress Report forget they promised, and devoted himself to the service of the system of exploiters.
Not only that, reason it was obvious in captivity, because they forget their true nature. Reason of mankind free from the dogma and promisedSuperstition has been dogmatic and superstitious. It began the destruction of the human right to freedom of instrumentalzing what it technocentrism. He rejected any claim to the abstract. Adorno and Horkheimer said that "what is given up to understand the whole claim and approach of knowledge, given as such, not only in the abstract spatiotemporptral relations of the facts we can come to grips with them to determine, but on the contrary to convince them, as the surfaceas mediated conceptual moments which come only in the development of their social, historical and human importance for the performance. "
Claims of Enlightenment philosophy that there is no creature in the world that knowledge can not penetrate. In reality, this distributed knowledge is from the center. The philosophy of the Enlightenment is not emancipated man but intends to how humanity could be enslaved. Marxism, one of the most important philosophy of the Enlightenment and the World Champion wasof humanism, died at the hands of Stalin. In order to enslave humanity Stalin killed twenty six million people.
Even capitalism is also not lagging behind transformed into imperialism and fought major wars in the name of peace and progress of democracy. Democracy, which was for the people, the people and the people finally transformed into the discourse of experience. Until the beginning of the twentieth century, democracy was turned into an ethics of the market. Everythingis from the perspective of the market, whether it is intended, as seen philosophy, culture or art.
Today, philosophers do not consider the problems of human life and not as problems that can be overcome by creating the market. Orientation of thought, such as the existence of man in harmony could see the progress of materialism. Democracy, swore to serve in the name of God to humanity in the course of their development, were anti-people. Against this anti-people approach of capitalist democracyPostmodernism emerged. Philosophy of the Enlightenment could not provide a philosophy of man as the ultimate goal of their liberty, "might find themselves".
Postmodern philosophers promise, lost dignity back, to be his freedom "itself." What modernity could not be executed; take postmodernism claims to complete. Well has been since the modern as the "unfinished project declared ',' post-modernity" is here. He says that we are here to complete"unfinished project of modernity". But how they will lead the project? Answer lies in the method of knowledge, because it was way to modernity led on wrong path. Philosophy of the Enlightenment failed because it is metaphysical and always directed towards a goal. It legitimizes only the knowledge of forms or speeches which were useful to the system. The aim of knowledge was to compare the performance of the system, as Lyotard would say, to optimize.
Postmodernism puts knowledge in the service of peopleFormerly it was in the service of capitalism. He argues that capitalism is, to the knowledge center of power shifted from the classes at many stations, the actual holders of power. In this context, Postmodernism developed a different notion of subjectivity as to Enlightenment notion of subjectivity, because this is by changing the concept of the subject matter of the changes to be brought about. In the philosophy of the Enlightenment about the epistemological and historical subject from further moral and wascultural concept of subjectivity, which is largely Christian. Subject in the Modern Philosophy was autonomous, morally and politically responsible persons to shape their own lives, how they are ruled over by custom and authority. So it was a historical subject, depending on the epistemology of historicism, and finally he ordered that they formed, cultivated them and put them in the service of the system. Subject autonomous only in the system, the territory in the crowd. Postmodern philosophyattacks. Postmodern philosophers see that the real fault does not see the philosophy of the Enlightenment subject of specific periodicity, or influencing a subject of active and self is confirmed. Subject to the philosophy of the Enlightenment was seen as historic, but its character largely Christian.
Postmodernism attempts to free subject of Cartesian wisdom, the notion of the subject as a rational self-conscious unity. Postmodern philosophers say that hisnot solve self-conscious subject and rationality at its disposal Enlightenment philosophies, the concept of the subject matter, how to establish a causal link between the life and the world around us. Subject to the philosophy of the Enlightenment a nomadic subject, was the experience of the world is irrational. The Enlightenment was just a mental habit formed historically. Since subject never experienced the world as it is because the principle by which they experienced wasmetaphysical, that rejected immanent experience.
Experience was conceived just a psychological phenomena. Postmodern philosopher sees experience from the perspective of immanence, they want to step up, picks it up, her best, but not psychologically more organic. Desire to desire experience in all its nakedness, in its rudeness, as far as man can celebrate the immanence of finitude, is one of the key issues for the postmodern philosophers. Let us listen to us not forget thatPostmodern philosophy itself is a project to solve the problems created by the materialism in Western society tries. The philosophers of the postmodern project are largely recruited leaders of the capitalists to solve the problem created by capitalism. In the search for a different way for capitalism, they philosophize. Postmodern philosophers are largely political in their writings, since they received the task of locating people or society in the right materialist discourse.
Let us see howThey see the issue and how they solve the problems created by materialism. In the search to find the root cause of the discontent of the Western society in which greed. They say that because the aspirations of immanence, because this Western society have found dissatisfaction have. She thought about the desire and the ability to desire, because desire, which is located in the heart of the materialist discourse and development. They argue that only the philosophy and spirituality of desire to savematerialistic society, because there is no way that materialism has been an absolute phenomenon and can not be undone. Metaphysics of the West moved from the center of desire, postmodernism places it in the middle of everything.
It was noted by many philosophers, beginning with Nietzsche, Bergson, Bataille, and Spinoza, etc., but since they could not put it in the materialist discourse of postmodern philosophy is to make it intrinsically made meditate. Postmodern philosophy of immanence againstPlace of transcendence, and suggests that there should be affirmed, and an active libratory means joy and affects the acquisition of a perspective of life through the eyes of fate to see that a life is as inherent and inevitable change in the forces. They say the man is a dream machine and wish its people, even the liberated and to be increased. As De Sade says, "My passions by focusing on one particular point, like rays of light from a starassembled in a lens, you quickly ignite any object they find in their way "to. Postmodern metaphysics of desire is in his biologism who believed deeply rooted through Bergson and Spinoza. Spinoza that there is no aspect of the reality of" transcending Nature is God. The only God, it is for him is a principle of creation, the immanent and inherent in the divine nature. It is like a theory of Charvaka philosophers of ancient India, which believed in bhutachaitanya (Charvakabelieved that consciousness is made of material elements). Charvaka believed that there is no conscious awareness of the body other than that of pleasure and pain caused by exertion, and their absence will be marked closed. Strain and its absence is observed to exist in the bodies of earth, water, fire and air.
Thus, these elements are made by the desire, aversion, and knowledge and must be the loci of consciousness. This Charvaka theory, the elementsConsciousness by Bergson in his theory accepted by the elan vital. He also argued that, for example, the iron particles are attracted to a magnet shows that the particles are aware of and desirous. One of the leading Deleuze postmodern theory of the forces that Bergason grounded in science and philosophy is very Charvaka. It does not go through Charvaka go as far as the concept of experience is. Charvaka philosophers in the history of mankind, the first propagated the theory ofBiologism. It seems that the goal of postmodernism is not free cause for mankind and not mankind's natural state.
His ideal literary personality Sade says that the rule of law, that anarchy has been unsuccessful because natural law. He takes a last sentence as follows: God asks people, "if you have seen that everything in the world is evil and criminal, why did you stray to the path of virtue? The eternal misery in which I has the mantle of the Universe not enough to convinceShe whom I love chaos and that you annoy me to make myself happy? Did not every day to provide you with examples of the destruction? Why are not destructive? Idiot! Can you not simply to imitate me. "The same kind of destructive thinking (VITANDA vada or casuistry) Charvaka had, as they present no systematic theory of life had been. They advocated that" the only pleasure is good "is the call of nature It is the highest goal of human life. postmodern ontology based onthe same theory, but in a more rational manner.
They hope that a man is smitten in the naturalness, they would be found their losses "for thinking people" and the goal of structuralism. Postmodernism is structuralism itself, and calls it post-structuralism, as it thinks more rationally and substantive as structuralism, the past, therefore ending the project taken over by structuralism. Why is there much value is determined by the postmodern thinker? Why is the Cityall kinds of discourse? What kind of human problem solving it? Are some very important questions should be answered. I believe that all their care of capitalist development and positioning of people in this development.
What could be done in a materialistic way of man systematized in the materialistic development. With the rejection of all previous philosophies on the grounds that they have no adequate solution to deal with the outbreak of the basic instincts they found their questions andthus the solution. Through the deconstruction of idealism as a kind of life they do with all means the people believe that there is nothing higher than desired and intensification of desire, since the intensification of the desire to reach the immanence of true spirituality.
Through this projection, they solve all human problems 1-they make people committed to freedom, because it was the man, because demand is limited morally 2 - would be helped by the exemption, the man returned to his desire natural abode, which he lost back 3 - from thismaterialistic development fast track, because people take more and more produce to satisfy himself 4 - for man is a desiring machine, he can be easily mounted in the dream machine of materialist production mechanism 5 are - have no problems from that capitalism, in the future for man is transformed into dream machine
